Ns. Latman et R. Walls, PERSONALITY AND STRESS - AN EXPLORATORY COMPARISON OF RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS AND OSTEOARTHRITIS, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 77(8), 1996, pp. 796-800
Objective: To characterize and investigate the relationship between st
ress and personality in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared
to those with osteoarthritis (OA). Design: Survey of personality char
acteristics determined by using Cattell's 16 Personality Factor (16PF)
questionnaire and stressful life events at disease onset determined b
y using the Social Readjustment Rating Scale of Holmes and Rahe. Setti
ng: Inpatients of an arthritis hospital and outpatients of a clinic, b
oth of which specialize in rheumatic diseases and musculoskeletal prob
lems. Participants: Diagnosed as ''definite'' or ''classical'' RA (N=1
28) according to the ARA Diagnostic Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis
(1958 Revision) or as OA (N=79) according to radiological and clinical
evidence; randomly selected, resulting in a close match for gender, a
ge at disease onset, duration of disease, functional classification, a
nd pattern of disease progress. All individuals approached participate
d. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Twenty personality char
acteristics, as well as amount of stressful life events at disease ons
et (Life Change Units). Results: The RA subjects had significantly (p
<.001) more stress at disease onset compared to the OA subjects. A sub
group of high-stress-at-onset RA subjects experienced a higher degree
of disease severity (p <.01) than did the RA subjects with no stress a
t onset. Although the mean personality scores for those with RA were n
ot significantly different from those with OA, the RA personality freq
uency distributions were different. Some of these differences could be
explained by the stress-at-onset subgroup personality characteristics
. Conclusions: As a group, subjects with RA exhibited more stress at d
isease onset than those with OA. Although mean personality scores were
not different between RA and OA subjects, they did exhibit different
frequency distributions. There appeared to be a high-stress-at-onset s
ubgroup of RA patients who had a worse disease prognosis and who corre
sponded to a personality frequency subgroup. The interaction between t
hese variables is more complex than implied by the ''RA personality''
concept. (C) 1996 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.