W. Wenger et P. Kligfield, VARIABILITY OF PRECORDIAL ELECTRODE PLACEMENT DURING ROUTINE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY, Journal of electrocardiology, 29(3), 1996, pp. 179-184
Placement of precordial electrodes by 30 experienced technicians durin
g routine electrocardiography was compared with anatomically ascertain
ed sites marked by ink visible only under ultraviolet ''black light''
in three men and five women. The distance and direction from each mark
ed site to the center of the applied electrode was measured to allow c
alculation of both the linear magnitude of difference (derived from th
e square root of the sum of the squares of rise and run) and also the
direction of difference (in quadrants) between the anatomically establ
ished location and the electrode al each precordial site. The average
difference from the applied electrodes to the corresponding marked sit
es was 1.14 inches, ranging from a mean of 1.31 inches at lead V-1 to
0.98 inches at lead V-4. Overall, 64% of precordial electrodes were pl
aced within a radius of 1.25 inch, ranging from 56% for lead V-6 to 74
% for lead V-4 and 27% of precordial electrodes were placed within a r
adius of 0.625 inch. There was superior quadrant displacement of more
than 0.625 inch in more than 50% of routine applications of leads V-1
and V-2, indicating that these electrodes are commonly placed both hig
h and wide of their anatomically defined precordial sites. Similarly,
there was an inferior and leftward displacement of more than 0.625 inc
h in 30-50% leads of routine applications of V-4 through V-6, indicati
ng that these lateral precordial electrodes are commonly placed both l
ow and wide of their respective anatomic sites.