D. Mcfadden et al., ADDITIONAL FINDINGS ON HERITABILITY AND PRENATAL MASCULINIZATION OF COCHLEAR MECHANISMS - CLICK-EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, Hearing research, 97(1-2), 1996, pp. 102-119
A previous demonstration of a substantial genetic contribution to the
expression of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) is here extend
ed to an aspect of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs). CEOAEs
were measured in the same twins and non-twins used for the SOAE herit
ability study. The stimuli were 100-mu s clicks presented at a nominal
rate of 2/s; the emitted waveforms from 50 clicks were summed, and a
20-ms sample of that averaged waveform (beginning 6 ms after click pre
sentation) was subjected to spectral analysis, The total power in the
spectrum from 1 to 5 kHz in this temporal segment of the CEOAE wavefor
m was used as the primary dependent variable. This overall power was s
ignificantly greater in female and right ears than in male and left ea
rs, but the difference between dark- and light-eyed subjects was not s
ignificant. The overall power in the two left, and two right, ears of
monozygotic co-twins was more highly correlated than in dizygotic co-t
wins, and structural modeling indicated that about 65-85% of the indiv
idual variation in the expression of CEOAE power could be attributed t
o genes-essentially the same heritability estimate as obtained previou
sly from the SOAE data. Within-subject correlations between CEOAE powe
r and number of SOAEs ranged from about 0.3 to 0.7, suggesting that th
ese two forms of otoacoustic emission may depend upon somewhat differe
nt aspects of the same underlying mechanism and, thus, that heritabili
ty estimates based on one measure are not completely redundant to thos
e from the other. While the average spectral power of the CEOAEs in op
posite-sex dizygotic (OSDZ) females was smaller than that in same-sex
dizygotic (SSDZ) females-and thus approached the value for males-the d
ifference did not achieve statistical significance. Thus, the evidence
for a prenatal masculinizing effect was less definitive in these CEOA
E data than in the SOAE data obtained from the same subjects. An inter
pretation that accounts for both the CEOAE and SOAE results is that th
e strength of the so-called cochlear amplifiers is under genetic contr
ol that is to some extent mediated and/or modified through prenatal ex
posure to androgens. The indicated direction of effect is that weak co
chlear amplifiers result when prenatal androgen levels are high. Under
this view, then, androgen levels contribute both to the sex differenc
es observed in otoacoustic emissions and the prenatal masculinizing ef
fects observed in opposite-sex twins, and they may be a factor in indi
vidual differences in OAE expression as well. Additionally it is shown
that, although the powers of the CEOAE waveforms were reasonably high
ly correlated for the two ears of subjects in all groups, and across M
Z co-twins, cross-correlations on the fine structures of those same pa
irs of CEOAE waveforms were essentially zero-presumably owing largely
to the synchronizing of (different) SOAE frequencies in the ears being
compared.