Background. Sore throat is very common in general practice and is usua
lly caused by viral infection. Nevertheless, up to 95% of patients may
be treated with antibiotics. Previous diagnostic systems have not tra
nsferred well from one area to another because of an inability to allo
w for changing prevalence of streptococcus. Aim. To measure the occurr
ence rates of symptoms and signs in sore throat patients with and with
out streptococcal infection, and to develop a Bayesian scoring system
which is easily adapted for prevalence to predict if patients have bac
terial infection. Method. Occurrence rates of symptoms and signs were
measured for 206 patients with sore throat symptoms over a 3-year peri
od. Bayesian probability scores (B-scores) for each data item were cal
culated from the ocurrence rates in the patients with positive throat
cultures for group A streptococci and the rates in patients with negat
ive throat cultures. The B-score values were then used to predict the
probability of positive culture for each patient. Results. The strepto
coccal throat B-score system predicted positive culture with a sensiti
vity of 71% and a specificity of 71%. In comparison, the unaided gener
al practitioners predicted infection with a sensitivity of 61% and a s
pecificity of 65%. If the B-score prediction had been used to decide o
n treatment, more patients with streptococci present on culture would
have been treated with antibiotic (71% instead of 68%) and appreciably
fewer patients with negative streptococcal cultures would have been t
reated (29% instead of 59%). Conclusion. Use of the B-score system cou
ld result in significant savings in unnecessary antibiotic prescriptio
n, and unnecessary throat swab cultures, while achieving better levels
of treatment.