Em. Bignal et Di. Mccracken, LOW-INTENSITY FARMING SYSTEMS IN THE CONSERVATION OF THE COUNTRYSIDE, Journal of Applied Ecology, 33(3), 1996, pp. 413-424
1. The historical role of agriculture in creating semi-natural vegetat
ion is still not fully appreciated by many ecologists, conservationist
s, policy-makers or the general public. Nor is the fact that for many
European landscapes and biotopes of high nature conservation value, th
e only practicable, socially acceptable and sustainable management inv
olves the continuation of low-intensity farming. Consequently, too muc
h emphasis is placed on attempting to ameliorate damaging effects of a
gricultural management rather than supporting ecologically sustainable
low-intensity farming practices. 2. More than 50% of Europe's most hi
ghly valued biotopes occur on low-intensity farmland. However, most of
this farmland has no environmental policy directly affecting it; most
management decisions are taken by farm businesses and determined prim
arily by European and national agricultural officials. As a result, th
ere continues to be intensification or abandonment of traditional prac
tices, changes which are equally damaging to the nature conservation v
alue. 3. However, the nature conservation importance of low-intensity
farming systems is gradually being recognized. Reforms and reviews of
agriculture policy are providing a variety of potential opportunities
for maintaining such systems. Unfortunately, initiating change through
policy is a slow process. There is therefore also a pressing need to
look for other opportunities to maintain surviving systems and, where
possible, to reinstate those recently lost. 4. Although these systems
may be considered low-intensity in terms of chemical inputs and produc
tivity, they are usually high-intensity in terms of human labour. Ther
efore, the processes that make the low-intensity farmed countryside bi
ologically rich and diverse must be understood, but at the same time m
echanisms to make life easier and more rewarding for the people who wo
rk such farmland must be found. 5. Ecologists and conservationists sho
uld think less of 'remnants of habitat being left amongst farmland' an
d more of a farmland biotope for which optimum management practices ne
ed to be developed. At the same time the current emphasis on site-base
d conservation should be complemented by strategic initiatives that pr
omote wise management of the wider countryside.