R. Pacher et al., EFFECTS OF 2 DIFFERENT ENALAPRIL DOSAGES ON CLINICAL, HEMODYNAMIC ANDNEUROHUMORAL RESPONSE OF PATIENTS WITH SEVERE CONGESTIVE-HEART-FAILURE, European heart journal, 17(8), 1996, pp. 1223-1232
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors improve symptoms and prolong
life in congestive heart failure, but the dose in the individual patie
nt is uncertain. A randomized, 48-week, double-blind study was perform
ed to investigate the safety and efficacy of 'high' in comparison to c
ontinued 'low' angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in seve
re heart failure. Eighty-three patients (56+/-1.1 years; 69 men, 14 wo
men) in New York Heart Association functional class III/IV on digoxin,
furosemide and 'low' angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (captop
ril less than or equal to 50 mg.day(-1) or enalapril less than or equa
l to 10 mg.day(-1)) were included. After a less than or equal to 14 da
y run-in on 10 mg.day(-1) enalapril, digitalis and furosemide, right h
eart catheterization at rest and exercise was performed. All patients
presented with atrial pressure >10 mmHg and/or pulmonary artery pressu
re >35 mmHg, and/or cardiac index <2.51.min(-1).m(-2) at rest. Patient
s then received enalapril 5 mg twice daily (n=42), or 20 mg twice dail
y (n=41) in random order. Thus, patients randomized to low doses of en
alapril actually had no change in therapy from baseline to 48 weeks. F
orty-three patients (52%) completed the study, 19 patients on the low
dose and 24 patients on the high dose. Both dosages equally influenced
survival with 15 (18%) deaths, eight on low dose and seven on high do
se. After 48 weeks, functional capacity by New York Heart Association
class improved more on the high dose than on the low dose (P=0.04). In
contrast, alterations in invasive haemodynamic variables at rest and
exercise as well as maximal exercise capacity were comparable in both
groups. Diastolic blood pressure decreased and the change between both
groups was statistically significant (P=0.01). Changes in plasma crea
tinine levels did not differ between high and low dose treatment and n
o patients had to be withdrawn because of deterioration in kidney func
tion. With regard to neurohumoral activity, a tendency to a discrepant
response to both treatments was observed with a blunted increase in n
oradrenaline on high versus low enalapril dose. Thus, high-dose enalap
ril treatment proved superior to low dose as regards symptomatology in
severe heart failure after long-term treatment, despite similar effec
ts on haemodynamics and on maximal exercise capacity.