SPEECH OUTCOMES OF A PROLONGED-SPEECH TREATMENT FOR STUTTERING

Citation
M. Onslow et al., SPEECH OUTCOMES OF A PROLONGED-SPEECH TREATMENT FOR STUTTERING, Journal of speech and hearing research, 39(4), 1996, pp. 734-749
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Language & Linguistics",Rehabilitation
ISSN journal
00224685
Volume
39
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
734 - 749
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-4685(1996)39:4<734:SOOAPT>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
It has been shown that people who stutter can speak with greatly reduc ed stuttering after treatments that use variations of Goldiamond's (19 65) prolonged-speech (PS). However, outcome research to date has not t aken account of several important issues. In particular, speech outcom e measures in that research have been insufficient to show that lastin g relief from stuttering has been achieved by clients outside the clin ic for meaningful periods. The present study used extensive speech out come measures across a variety of situations in evaluating the outcome of an intensive PS treatment (Ingham, 1987). The speech of 12 clients in this treatment was assessed on three occasions prior to treatment and frequently-on eight occasions-after discharge from the residential setting. For 7 clients, a further assessment occurred at 3 years post treatment. Concurrent dependent measures were percent syllables stutte red, syllables per minute, and speech naturalness. The dependent measu res were collected in many speaking situations within and beyond the c linic. Dependent measures were based on speech samples of substantive duration, and covert assessments were included in the study. Detailed data were presented for individual subjects. Results showed that 12 su bjects who remained with the entire 2-3-year program achieved zero or near-zero stuttering. The majority of subjects did not show a regressi on trend in %SS or speech naturalness scores during the posttreatment period, either within or beyond the clinic. Some subjects showed highe r posttreatment %SS scores during covert assessment than during overt assessment. Results also showed that stuttering was eliminated without using unusually slow and unnatural speech patterns. This treatment pr ogram does not specify a target speech rate range, and many clients ma intained stutter-free speech using speech rates that were higher than the range typically specified in intensive PS programs. A significant correlation was found between speech rate and perceived posttreatment speech naturalness.