Although it is generally accepted that surgery offers the only chance
of cure for esophageal cancer, there is still no consensus regarding t
he optimal operative treatment. Data from specialized centers indicate
that radical esophagectomy with two-field or three-field lymphadenect
omy can be performed with low perioperative morbidity and mortality. A
lthough such extended lymphadenectomies clearly lead to accurate stagi
ng, the therapeutic impact of these procedures is still a matter of de
bate. In order to tailor the extent of resection or neoadjuvant therap
y to the tumor stage of the individual patient, preoperative staging i
s important, Early results on the role of diagnostic laparoscopy and v
ideo-assisted thoracoscopy have become available. The interest in perf
orming minimally invasive esophagectomies is waning for various reason
s, Even extensive surgical therapy has unsatisfactory long-term result
s. The majority of patients develop locoregional or:distant tumor recu
rrence, Several (neo)adjuvant therapy trials have been performed, but
none have proven to be effective. In general, there is a shift in inte
rest from adjuvant to neoadjuvant therapy (especially combined chemo-
and radiotherapy). Unfortunately, most institutions report nonrandomiz
ed phase II trials with a great variety of therapeutic regimens. Moreo
ver, interpretation is frequently hampered because the various tumor s
tages are poorly defined and because no clear distinction is made betw
een squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas.