Palaeomagnetic studies on bore core or on tectonically disturbed local
ities often lose declination information, but the inclination still of
fers important palaeogeographic information. While the arithmetic mean
of inclinations, (I) over bar, is a biased estimator, the bias is neg
ligible with shallow data. Using co-inclination theta = 90 degrees - \
(I) over bar\ and precision kappa = 1/variance, we find that the arit
hmetic mean and associated 95 per cent confidence interval are accepta
ble estimates when theta root kappa > 400 degrees. When inclination i
s steep and/or precision low, numerical methods must be applied. We de
velop the likelihood function for theta and kappa and offer an efficie
nt method to find its maximum, (theta, kappa), and to calculate the co
nfidence interval. When theta root kappa < 200 degrees, the confidence
interval is asymmetric about the mean. When sites are collected from
several rigid blocks, the relative declinations within each block can
be useful. Using 'block-rotation Fisher analysis', better inclination
estimates with tighter confidence intervals can be made, even on very
steep data. We describe how to apply these methods to an inclination-o
nly fold test. The techniques are illustrated on real data and are tes
ted extensively using numerical simulations.