Rj. Just et al., CHANGES IN OVERNIGHT FASTING INTRAGASTRIC PH SHOW POOR CORRELATION WITH DUODENOGASTRIC BILE REFLUX IN NORMAL SUBJECTS, The American journal of gastroenterology, 91(8), 1996, pp. 1567-1570
Background: Spontaneous rises in intragastric pH are a common phenomen
on in patients and normal subjects who undergo prolonged ambulatory pH
monitoring; however, controversy exists over their etiology, Some inv
estigators have postulated that these events are secondary to duodenog
astric bile reflux (DGBR), and others have implicated increased saliva
tion or increased esophageal bicarbonate production, The advent of a f
iberoptic system that reliably identifies the presence of bilirubin ha
s made it feasible to qualitatively detect DGBR, We used this technolo
gy along with simultaneous ambulatory intragastric pH monitoring to ev
aluate the relationship between DGBR and rises in intragastric pH in n
ormal subjects, Methods: We studied five normal subjects for a 15-h ov
ernight period with simultaneous intragastric pH and bilirubin monitor
ing, The probes were sutured together so that the pH electrode lay adj
acent to the fiberoptic bilirubin sensor, then passed transnasally int
o the fundus of the stomach, Subjects were fasted for the entire study
, Data were obtained by plotting all intragastric pH values (recorded
every 4 s) and their corresponding intragastric bilirubin absorbance u
nits (recorded every 8 s) at 5-min intervals from the beginning to the
end of the study for each of the five subjects (n = 903), Results: Re
gression analysis of the data showed poor correlation (r = 0.26) betwe
en intragastric pH and intragastric bilirubin absorbance, Conclusion:
Rises in intragastic pH do not predict the presence of bile in normal
subjects, In addition, DGBR usually does not cause alkaline shifts of
intragastric pH, Although further studies are needed to fully elucidat
e the etiology of spontaneous rises in intragastric pH, we believe tha
t the measurement of ''alkaline reflux'' with ambulatory intragastric
pH monitoring alone is an outdated technique and that the Bilitec 2000
should become the standard technique for the detection of intralumina
l bile.