EVALUATION OF AN INTRAORAL MAXILLARY MOLAR DISTALIZATION TECHNIQUE

Authors
Citation
J. Ghosh et Rs. Nanda, EVALUATION OF AN INTRAORAL MAXILLARY MOLAR DISTALIZATION TECHNIQUE, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 110(6), 1996, pp. 639-646
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
ISSN journal
08895406
Volume
110
Issue
6
Year of publication
1996
Pages
639 - 646
Database
ISI
SICI code
0889-5406(1996)110:6<639:EOAIMM>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of the pendulum appliance on distalization of maxillary molars and the reciprocal eff ects on the anchor premolars and maxillary incisors. Initial and follo w-up cephalometric radiographs were obtained on 41 subjects (26 girls and 15 boys) who were treated with the pendulum appliance for bilatera l distalization of the maxillary first molar teeth, for correction of the Class II molar relationship or for gaining space in the maxillary arch. Dental casts were available on 31 patients, Dental, skeletal, an d soft tissue changes were determined. The mean maxillary first molar distalization was 3.37 mm, with a distal tipping of 8.36 degrees, The mean reciprocal mesial movement of the first premolar was 2.55 mm, wit h a mesial tipping of 1.29 degrees. The maxillary first molar position intruded 0.1 mm, whereas the first premolar extruded 1.7 mm. The tran sverse width between the mesiobuccal cusps of the first molars increas ed 1.40 mm. The maxillary second molars were also distalized 2.27 mm, tipped distally 11.99 degrees, and moved buccally 2.33 mm. The effect of distalization on the maxillary third molars was extremely variable, The eruption of maxillary second molars had minimal effect on distali zation of first molars. The lower anterior face height increased by 2. 79 mm. This increase was greater in patients with higher Frankfort-man dibular plane angle measurements, The pendulum appliance is an effecti ve and reliable method for distalizing maxillary molars, provided the anchor unit is adequately reinforced, Its major advantages are minimal dependence on patient compliance, ease of fabrication, one-time activ ation, adjustment of the springs if necessary to correct minor transve rse and vertical molar positions, and patient-acceptance.