Jd. Symons et Cl. Stebbins, EFFECTS OF ANGIOTENSIN-II RECEPTOR BLOCKADE DURING EXERCISE - COMPARISON OF LOSARTAN AND SARALASIN, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology, 28(2), 1996, pp. 223-231
Previous studies indicate that angiotensin II (ANG II) plays a minor r
ole in the hemodynamic responses during dynamic exercise. However, non
specific effects associated with methods used to block its production
[e.g., angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors] or receptors (e
.g., saralasin) may have contributed to these findings, Losartan is a
nonpeptide ANG II receptor antagonist that is devoid of such nonspecif
ic effects. We hypothesized that the contribution of ANG II to the car
diovascular response to dynamic exercise is characterized more precise
ly with losartan than with saralasin. On separate days, 6 miniswine pe
rformed treadmill running at 80% of their maximal heart rate (HR) rese
rve (HRR) in the presence of vehicle (0.9% saline), saralasin (10 or 2
0 mu g/kg/min intraleft arterially, i.a.), or losartan (15 or 20 mg/kg
i.a.). Cardiac output (GO), HR, and myocardial contractility were sim
ilar among all exercise conditions. As compared with the vehicle, losa
rtan decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP) and systemic vascular resi
stance (SVR) during exercise, whereas no differences occurred between
the vehicle and saralasin conditions. Both receptor antagonists increa
sed blood flow and/or decreased vascular resistance during exercise in
the myocardium, stomach, small intestine, and colon. As compared with
that during treadmill running with vehicle infusion, renal blood flow
(RBF) was increased by losartan and decreased by saralasin. We conclu
de that the contribution of ANG II to the cardiovascular response to d
ynamic exercise is demonstrated more clearly with losartan than with s
aralasin.