Tm. Vesely et al., THROMBOLYSIS VERSUS SURGICAL THROMBECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF DIALYSIS GRAFT THROMBOSIS - PILOT-STUDY COMPARING COSTS, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology, 7(4), 1996, pp. 507-512
PURPOSE: This preliminary investigation was designed to compare the co
st of pharmacomechanical thrombolysis and angioplasty with that of sur
gical thrombectomy for the treatment of thrombosed hemodialysis grafts
. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized study consisted o
f 20 patients with unrevised, polytetrafluoroethylene forearm dialysis
grafts of similar configuration in which graft thrombosis occurred fo
r the first time. Ten patients underwent pulse-spray thrombolysis plus
angioplasty, and 10 patients underwent surgical thrombectomy. The tec
hnical costs, professional fees, and all other associated costs were o
btained. Procedural data, graft patency rates, and demographic informa
tion were analyzed. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 70% for th
rombolysis and 80% for surgical thrombectomy. The duration of patency,
including the technical failures, was 81.6 days for thrombolysis and
93.9 days for surgery. For the thrombolysis and angioplasty procedure,
the median technical cost was $2,906 and the median professional fee
was $3,156 for a median total cost of $6,062. The median technical cos
t for surgical thrombectomy was $2,449 and the median surgical fee was
$2,100, but these patients incurred an additional anesthesia fee (med
ian, $1,031) bringing the total median cost to $5,580. CONCLUSIONS: Th
ese two competing procedures were comparable in cost.