Background In familial adenomatous polyposis the only curative treatme
nt is colectomy, and the choice of operation lies between restorative
proctocolectomy (RPC) and colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA).
The RPC procedure carries a higher morbidity but, unlike IRA, removes
the risk of subsequent rectal cancer. Since the course of familial ad
enomatous polyposis is influenced by the site of mutation in the polyp
osis gene, DNA analysis might be helpful in treatment decisions. Metho
ds We evaluated the incidence of rectal cancer in polyposis patients w
ho had undergone IRA, and examined whether the requirement for subsequ
ent rectal excision because of cancer or uncontrollable polyps was rel
ated to the site of mutation. Findings Between 1956 and mid-1995, 225
patients registered at the Netherlands Polyposis Registry had undergon
e IRA. In 87 of them, a pathogenetic mutation was detected. 72 patient
s had a mutation located before codon 1250 and 15 patients after this
codon. The cumulative risk of rectal cancer 20 years after surgery was
12%, and at that time 42% had undergone rectal excision. The risk of
secondary surgery was higher in patients with mutations in the region
after codon 1250 than in patients with mutations before this codon (re
lative risk 2.7, p<0.05). Interpretation On this evidence, IRA should
be the primary treatment for polyposis in patients with mutations befo
re codon 1250, and RPC in those with mutations after this codon.