The concept of the death instinct developed by Freud in Beyond the Ple
asure Principle, and since then more ignored than debated, is approach
ed by the author from a specific angle. By tracing Freud's quest for t
he >>Beyond<< (which he ultimately gave the name of >>death instinct<<
) and spelling out the contradictions and inconsistencies that come to
light in the process, she demonstrates that these latter are not grou
nded in the concept but in the nature of the subject itself, in other
words that the >>Beyond<< is a rhetorical mire-en-scene inscribed into
the text. With reference to the subtle meanings of the there/not-ther
e game and the interplay between the notions of eros and death instinc
t, Lochel shows that the assumption of a death instinct is an inner-th
eoretical necessity which Freud did not however have the metalinguisti
c resources to handle. The author contends that if there are sexual an
d life instincts, there must also be something beyond. Representation
needs the death instinct as something representation-less in the same
way as writing needs an empty page. The death instinct - by no means a
purely conceptual imperative - Is the price that has to be paid for p
sychic representation.