ENUMERATING HOMELESS PEOPLE - ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES

Citation
P. Koegel et al., ENUMERATING HOMELESS PEOPLE - ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES, Evaluation review, 20(4), 1996, pp. 378-403
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Social, Sciences, Interdisciplinary
Journal title
ISSN journal
0193841X
Volume
20
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
378 - 403
Database
ISI
SICI code
0193-841X(1996)20:4<378:EHP-AS>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Decisions about how inclusive one should be in at tempting to sample a nd/or enumerate homeless populations are best guided by information re garding what is sacrificed when different sampling choices are made. T his article draws upon data from the Course of Homelessness Study to e xplore how three progressively less inclusive sampling frames affect u nderstandings of the size and characteristics of homeless populations in two Los Angeles sites. Findings suggest that less inclusive samplin g frames substantially affect population estimates, but do not consist ently produce biased estimates of population characteristics. Whether, and the extent to which, such bias is introduced varies by site, by g ender; and by the population characteristic in question.