INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY OF THE CHEST RADIOGRAPH IN COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA

Citation
Mn. Albaum et al., INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY OF THE CHEST RADIOGRAPH IN COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA, Chest, 110(2), 1996, pp. 343-350
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Respiratory System
Journal title
ChestACNP
ISSN journal
00123692
Volume
110
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
343 - 350
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3692(1996)110:2<343:IROTCR>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the interobserver reliability of pulmonary radi ographic findings in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Design: A prospective, multicenter study. Setting: Physician offices, medical walk-in clinics, emergency departments, and inpatient wards a ffiliated with three university hospitals, one community hospital, and one staff model health maintenance organization in three geographic a reas. Methods: Copies of the initial chest radiograph of patients susp ected of having CAP were independently read by two staff radiologists at the coordinating university hospital. Interobserver reliability for the interpretation for radiographic findings was assessed by calculat ion of agreement rates and the kappa statistic. Participants: Adults ( age greater than or equal to 18 years) with symptoms or signs of CAP a nd a pulmonary radiographic infiltrate documented by a local study sit e radiologist. Results: Among the 282 patients whose initial pulmonary radiographs were evaluated, there was agreement between the two staff radiologists on the presence of infiltrate in 79.4% and on the absenc e of an infiltrate in 6.0% (kappa=0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0 .22 to 0.52). For the 224 patients with an infiltrate identified by bo th radiologists, there was further agreement that the infiltrate was u nilobar in 41.5% and multilobar in 33.9% (kappa=0.51; 95% CI=0.28 to 0 .62), pleural effusion was present in 10.7% and absent in 73.2% (kappa =0.46; 95% CI=0.33 to 0.50), and the infiltrate was alveolar in 96.3% of patients and interstitial in no patients (kappa=-0.01; 95% CI=-0.03 to 0.00). Among the 210 patients with an alveolar infiltrate, both ra diologists classified the infiltrate as lobar in 74.6% and bronchopneu monia in 2.4% (kappa=0.09; 95% CI=-0.04 to 0.22), and agreed on the pr esence of air bronchograms in 7.6% and their absence in 52.9% (kappa=0 .01; 95% CI= -0.13 to 0.15). Conclusion: In patients with CAP, two uni versity radiologists identified the presence of infiltrate, multilobar disease, and pleural effusion with fair to good interobserver reliabi lity. However, interobserver reliability for the pattern of infiltrate and the presence of air bronchograms was poor.