Ge. Woodson et al., ASSESSING VOCAL FUNCTION AFTER CHEMORADIATION FOR ADVANCED LARYNGEAL CARCINOMA, Archives of otolaryngology, head & neck surgery, 122(8), 1996, pp. 858-864
Objective: To identify objective parameters that could serve as valid
indicators of vocal function in evaluating patients treated at multipl
e centers for head and neck cancer. Design: Objective measures of voic
e were validated against functional outcome measures of voice and comm
unication. Setting: A multidisciplinary university-based ambulatory he
ad and neck cancer clinic. Subjects: Fifteen patients at varying postt
reatment intervals after chemoradiation therapy for head and neck canc
er and 5 volunteers with no cancer but with a history of heavy smoking
and drinking. Main Outcome Measures: Acoustic and aerodynamic paramet
ers were measured in patients with head and neck cancer after treatmen
t with combined chemotherapy and irradiation and in control subjects.
Communicative function was assessed by perceptual assessment of record
ed voice samples, by a clinician-based communication score, and by pat
ient self-rating of voice and communication. Results: Both perceptual
analysis and communication score were concordant with patient self-rat
ing of voice and communication ability. Acoustic measures were abnorma
l in patients, and jitter scores correlated with listener ratings of p
erceived voice quality. However, acoustic measures did not relate to c
ommunication function, as assessed by either the patient or the clinic
ian. Laryngeal resistance demonstrated a significant correlation with
both patient and observer assessments of voice quality and communicati
on function. Laryngeal resistance was on average twice as high in pati
ents who complained of voice fatigue, but this difference was not stat
istically significant. Conclusions: Laryngeal resistance, determined d
uring standardized phonation, is a reliable objective parameter of voc
al function after chemoradiation therapy for head and neck cancer. A s
tandardized clinician-based communication scale holds promise as a use
ful tool. Acoustic measures reflect the sound of the voice but not the
ability to communicate effectively.