Participants wrote accounts to victims of social predicaments. Results
showed that autonomous perpetrators offered more mitigation, used mor
e complexity in accounts, and used fewer lies, especially to acquainta
nces. High blame was associated with less mitigating and complex accou
nts and greater deception; this occurred despite perpetrators' underst
anding of probable relationship harm. Women were more concerned with r
epairing others' face damage, at least in part to preserve relationshi
ps; their self-esteem also was more harmed by lack of forgiveness, esp
ecially from friends. Perpetrators gave longer, more mitigating and co
mplex, accounts to friends and more mitigating accounts to high-status
victims. Participants who used aggravating elements expected more pos
itive relationships. Results are discussed in terms of competing deman
ds for facework.