DIETARY INFLUENCES ON ENDOGENOUS ILEAL PROTEIN AND AMINO-ACID LOSS INTHE PIG - A REVIEW

Citation
S. Boisen et Pj. Moughan, DIETARY INFLUENCES ON ENDOGENOUS ILEAL PROTEIN AND AMINO-ACID LOSS INTHE PIG - A REVIEW, Acta agriculturae Scandinavica. Section A, Animal science, 46(3), 1996, pp. 154-164
Citations number
53
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience
ISSN journal
09064702
Volume
46
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
154 - 164
Database
ISI
SICI code
0906-4702(1996)46:3<154:DIOEIP>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
The basis for using determined values of endogenous ileal protein and amino acid losses in the protein evaluation of pig feeds is reviewed. The amounts of endogenous protein and amino acids in ileal digesta may be determined by numerous methods. These include N-free diets, regres sion analysis, enzyme hydrolysed casein (EHC) coupled with ultra-filtr ation, modifying lysine to homoarginine, isotope dilution techniques a nd calculations based on the difference between the in vitro and in vi vo digestibility of protein and amino acids. Endogenous ileal protein loss seems to be influenced primarily by dietary dry matter intake and secondarily by the composition of the diet and can be divided into a basal and an extra loss. The basal loss after ingestion of experimenta l N-free diets is 10-15 kg(-1) DM intake, but, under more physiologica lly normal conditions when protein-containing diets are ingested, the basal loss seems to be about 20 g kg(-1) DM intake. When vegetable fee dstuffs are ingested there is often an extra loss specifically induced by the presence of dietary fibre and/or antinutritional factors (ANFs ), resulting in total losses that are typically in the range of 20 to 40 g kg(-1) DM intake. The amino acid composition of endogenous protei n is relatively constant for different diets and methods of determinat ion and seems not to be influenced significantly by the amount of loss and liveweight of pig. For practical purposes, and lacking evidence t o the contrary, the composition can be considered to be constant and t he following general composition (g per 160 g N) of essential amino ac ids is proposed: lysine 30, methionine 10, cystine 16, threonine 45, t ryptophan 12, isoleucine 25, leucine 40, histidine 15, phenylalanine 3 0, tyrosine 20, valine 35. The composition is, compared with ideal pro tein and most feedstuffs, characterized by a relatively low contributi on of all essential amino acids, except threonine, cystine and tryptop han.