SELECTIVE FUNCTIONAL-PROPERTIES OF DUAL ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODAL INPUTS- ROLE IN NODAL CONDUCTION, REFRACTORINESS, SUMMATION, AND RATE-DEPENDENT FUNCTION IN RABBIT HEART
F. Amellal et J. Billette, SELECTIVE FUNCTIONAL-PROPERTIES OF DUAL ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODAL INPUTS- ROLE IN NODAL CONDUCTION, REFRACTORINESS, SUMMATION, AND RATE-DEPENDENT FUNCTION IN RABBIT HEART, Circulation, 94(4), 1996, pp. 824-832
Background The atrioventricular node receives its activation signal fr
om the low crista terminalis and low interatrial septum, the summation
of which is believed to favor conduction. A functional asymmetry betw
een the inputs is also believed to be involved in nodal reentrant rhyt
hms. We studied the selective functional characteristics of nodal inpu
ts and determined their role in nodal conduction, refractoriness, summ
ation, and rate-dependent function. Methods and Results The nodal prop
erties of recovery, facilitation, and fatigue were characterized with
stimulation protocols applied with varying phases between the two inpu
ts in isolated rabbit heart preparations. The effects of the input pha
se, nodal functional state, and input reference on the nodal conductio
n time, recovery time, and refractory periods were assessed with multi
factorial ANOVAs. It was found that the phase of stimulation significa
ntly affected nodal conduction time but not the refractory periods or
the time constant of the recovery. Each input could show longer and sh
orter conduction time than the other depending on the stimulation phas
e, input reference, and coupling interval. These effects were similar
for different nodal functional states. However, pacing and recording f
rom the low crista resulted in similar conduction and refractory value
s than did pacing and recording from the low septum. Input summation d
id not increase the otherwise equal efficacy of individual input in ac
tivating the node. Nodal surface recordings confirmed this functional
symmetry and equivalent efficacy of the inputs and showed that input e
ffects were confined to the proximal node. Conclusions The two nodal i
nputs have equivalent functional properties and are equally effective
in activating the rate-dependent portion of the node. Input interactio
n affects perinodal activation but not the rate-dependent nodal functi
on.