Background - Identification of food chemical intolerance in asthmatic
subjects can be reliably assessed by changes in the forced expiratory
volume in one second (FEV(1)) in response to double blind, placebo con
trolled challenges on a strict elimination diet. However, this method
is cumbersome and time consuming. A study was undertaken to determine
whether changes in bronchial responsiveness to histamine following foo
d chemical challenge without an elimination diet might be a faster, mo
re convenient method. Methods - Eleven adult asthmatic subjects were c
hallenged twice with metabisulphite, aspirin, monosodium glutamate, ar
tificial food colours, sodium nitrite/nitrate, 0.5% citric acid soluti
on (placebo), and sucrose (placebo) on separate days. During the first
set of challenges subjects consumed a normal diet. Bronchial responsi
veness to histamine was assessed 90 minutes after each challenge. A gr
eater than twofold increase in bronchial responsiveness was considered
positive. For one month prior to and during the second set of challen
ges subjects followed a strict elimination diet and FEV(1) was monitor
ed during and for two hours after each challenge. A fall in FEV(1) of
20% or more was considered positive. Results - Of the 77 food chemical
challenges performed on an unmodified diet, 20 were positive (six pla
cebo responses). In two subjects it was not possible to perform a hist
amine test after one of the chemical challenges because of poor spirom
etric function. Of the 77 food chemical challenges performed on an eli
mination diet, 11 were positive (no placebo responses). Excluding the
two challenges in which there were no corresponding histamine tests, o
nly on two occasions did the positive responses in both methods coinci
de, giving the unmodified diet method a sensitivity of 22%. Conclusion
- Strict dietary elimination and measurement of FEV(1) after double b
lind food chemical challenge remains the most reliable method for the
detection of food chemical intolerance in asthmatic subjects.