PROS AND CONS OF QUITTING, SELF-EFFICACY, AND THE STAGES OF CHANGE INSMOKING CESSATION

Citation
A. Dijkstra et al., PROS AND CONS OF QUITTING, SELF-EFFICACY, AND THE STAGES OF CHANGE INSMOKING CESSATION, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 64(4), 1996, pp. 758-763
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology, Clinical
ISSN journal
0022006X
Volume
64
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
758 - 763
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-006X(1996)64:4<758:PACOQS>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
In The Netherlands, 34% of the population smoke, and 70% of these smok ers are not planning to quit. The lower percentages in the U.S. popula tion seem to reflect a difference in smoking culture. This study analy zes the pros and cons of quitting and self-efficacy expectation in the 5 stages of change in the Dutch population. The results are compared with the pattern of the pros and cons of smoking and self-efficacy exp ectations found in U.S. samples. The data show the hypothesized patter n: In the first 2 stages, the expected positive outcomes of quitting d iscriminated better between the stages than self-efficacy, whereas for later stages, self-efficacy was the better discriminator. This study shows that the stage typology is applicable to the Dutch population an d that the pattern of the pros, cons, and self-efficacy is very simila r to the pattern found in the U.S. populations.