S. Behar et al., THE OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION INELIGIBLE FOR THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY, The American journal of medicine, 101(2), 1996, pp. 184-191
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of pati
ents with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) excluded from thrombolytic
therapy on a national basis and to evaluate the prognosis of these pa
tients by reasons of ineligibility and according to the alternative th
erapies that they received during hospitalization. PATIENTS AND METHOD
S: During a national survey, 1,014 consecutive patients with AMI were
hospitalized in all the 25 coronary care units operating in Israel.RES
ULTS: Three hundred and eighty-three patients (38%) were treated with
a thrombolytic agent and included in the GUSTO study. Ineligible patie
nts for GUSTO were treated: (1) without any reperfusion therapy (n = 4
49), (2) by mechanical revascularization (n = 97), or (3) given 1.5 mi
llion units of streptokinase (n = 85) outside of the GUSTO protocol. T
he in-hospital and 1-year post-discharge mortality rates were 6% and 2
% in patients included in the GUSTO study; 6% and 5% in those mechanic
ally reperfused; 15% and 10% in those treated with thromoblysis despit
e ineligibility for the GUSTO trial, and 15% and 13% among patients no
t treated with any reperfusion therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Ineligibility for
thrombolysis among patients with AMI remains high. Patients ineligibl
e for thrombolysis according to the GUSTO criteria, but nevertheless t
reated with a thrombolytic agent were exposed to an increased risk.