F. Boateng et al., STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS OF POSSIBLE BIAS OF CLINICAL JUDGMENTS DUE TO OBSERVING AN ON-THERAPY MARKER VARIABLE, Statistics in medicine, 15(16), 1996, pp. 1747-1755
In certain double-blind clinical trials there is the possibility that
certain 'marker variables' observable during the trial may in part unb
lind the trial, even at a subliminal level. At issue is whether or not
this potential unblinding biases the investigators' clinical efficacy
assessments. This issue arose after the completion of three clinical
trials that compared tretinoin emollient cream (TEC) 0.05 per cent to
its vehicle in patients with photodamaged skin. The question raised wa
s whether or not possible 'subliminal unblinding' of the investigators
and patients, due to the cutaneous irritation associated with topical
tretinoin, might have caused a treatment bias in the study. To addres
s this issue, we undertook a reanalysis of these three clinical trials
. In doing so, we develop in this paper a statistical modelling approa
ch to address issues of possible bias introduced by the ability to obs
erve such marker variables. The approach utilizes a linear discriminan
t analysis to introduce an auxiliary categorical variable for the effi
cacy analysis, A suitable categorical data model permits the estimatio
n of relevant bias effects. We illustrate this approach with data from
the three TEC 0.05 per cent trials.