THE VALUE OF INTRACRANIAL-PRESSURE MONITORING IN ACUTE HEMISPHERIC STROKE

Citation
S. Schwab et al., THE VALUE OF INTRACRANIAL-PRESSURE MONITORING IN ACUTE HEMISPHERIC STROKE, Neurology, 47(2), 1996, pp. 393-398
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Neurology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00283878
Volume
47
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
393 - 398
Database
ISI
SICI code
0028-3878(1996)47:2<393:TVOIMI>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Background and purpose: Persistently elevated intracranial pressure (I CP) has been associated with poor clinical outcome after severe brain injury, such as neurotrauma, intracerebral hemorrhage, and subarachnoi dal hemorrhage. Although ICP monitoring is increasingly being used in intensive care treatment of patients with ischemic stroke, its value h as not been established. Patients and methods: The clinical course of 48 patients with the clinical signs of increased ICP due to large hemi spheric or middle cerebral artery territory infarction defined by CT a nd subjected to ICP monitoring was prospectively evaluated. Epidural I CP probes were inserted ipsilaterally to the site of primary brain inj ury in all and also contralaterally in seven patients. Initial clinica l presentation was assessed by the Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS) and the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS). All patients were treated according to a standardized treatment protocol for elevated ICP. ICP values were co rrelated with the clinical presentation at the time point of deteriora tion, with outcome, and with CT findings. Different treatment strategi es to lower ICP were analyzed as to their effectiveness. Results: Only nine of the 48 patients survived the infarct (19%). The cause of deat h was transtentorial herniation with subsequent brain death in all 39 patients. The patients' mean SSS on admission was 20.6 (survivors 21.5 +/- 5.6, nonsurvivors 19.8 +/- 6.5). In all patients clinical signs o f herniation preceded the increase in ICP. Patients with ICP values > 35 mm Hg did not survive. CT changes did not always correspond with th e measured ICP values. All medical strategies to lower ICP, including osmotherapy, hyperventilation, THAM-buffer, and barbiturates, were ini tially effective, but only in a minority of patients was ICP control s ustained. Conclusions: TCP monitoring of large hemispheric infarction can predict clinical outcome. Pharmacologic intervention had no sustai ned effect. ICP monitoring was not helpful in guiding long-term treatm ent of increased ICP. It remains doubtful that ICP monitoring in acute ischemic stroke has a positive influence on clinical outcome.