The majority of 100-mL samples taken from drinking-water supplies in t
he UK register zero coliforms. Those samples may present a false sense
of security because water company operators do not know how close eac
h zero sample was to registering a coliform or how many were close to
registering coliforms. Furthermore, large deteriorations in water qual
ity with respect to coliforms could occur without detection at the 100
-mL level. The variability in total heterotrophic bacteria densities a
cross UK drinking-water supply zones during a year is shown to be acco
mmodated by the log-normal distribution. Some of that variability is s
easonal. In this paper, coliform densities in the drinking-water suppl
y are also modelled as log-normal distributions. This approach suggest
s that coliform densities may vary by as much as 10(8)-fold across the
supply and that large volumes could be void of coliforms. Monitoring
coliforms in 100-mL volumes is effectively an indicator of microbiolog
ical clustering within the drinking-water supply and does not alert op
erators to dilute homogeneously dispersed coliforms. For this reason,
the coliform standard may be more effective at protecting public healt
h against less infectious pathogens(e.g. Vibrio cholerae) than highly
infectious pathogens (e.g. rotavirus). Analysing coliform densities in
larger volumes of water would provide better information for monitori
ng and controlling quality.