This paper presents the first attempt to evaluate the potential of cli
nical UV exposures to induce the human immunodeficiency (HIV) promoter
and, thus, to upregulate HIV growth in those skin cells that are dire
ctly affected by the exposure. Using the data for HIV promoter activat
ion in vitro, we computed UVB and psoralen plus UVA (PUVA) doses that
produce 50% of the maximal promoter activation (AD(50)). Then, using (
a) literature data for UV transmittance in the human skin, (b) a compo
site action spectrum for HIV promoter and pyrimidine dimer induction b
y UVB and (c) an action spectrum for DNA synthesis inhibition by PUVA,
we estimated the distribution of medical UVB and PUVA doses in the sk
in. This allowed us to estimate how deep into the skin the HIV-activat
ing doses might penetrate in an initial and an advanced stage of UVB o
r PUVA therapy. Such analysis was done for normal type II skin and for
single exposures. The results allow us to predict where in the skin t
he HIV promoter may be induced by selected small and large therapeutic
UVB or PUVA doses. To accommodate changes in skin topography due to d
isease and UV therapy, our considerations would require further refine
ments. For UVB we found that, when the incident dose on the surface of
the skin is 500 J/m(2) (290-320 nm) (initial stage of the therapy), t
he dose producing 50% of the maximal HIV promoter activation (AD(50)(U
VB)) is limited to the stratum corneum. However, with an incident dose
of 5000 J/m(2) (an advanced stage of the therapy), AD(50)(UVB) may be
delivered as far as the living cells of the epidermis and even to som
e parts of the upper dermis. For PUVA we found that, when the incident
UVA doses are 25 or 100 kJ/m(2) (320-400 nm) (an initial and an advan
ced stage of therapy, respectively), and the 8-methoxypsoralen concent
ration in the blood is 0.1 mu g/mL (the desired level), the combined d
oses to the mid epidermis (and some areas of the upper dermis) are wel
l below the 50% HIV promoter-activating PUVA dose (AD(50)(PUVA)). Only
under the worst scenario conditions, i.e. an exceptionally high drug
concentration in the patient's tissues and localization of HIV in the
nearest proximity to the skin surface, would the combined PUVA dose ex
pected during photochemotherapy exceed AD(50)(PUVA). These results sug
gest that the probability of HIV activation in the epidermis by direct
mechanisms is higher for UVB than for PUVA treatment. However, comple
xities of the UV-inducible HIV activation and immunomodulatory phenome
na are such that our results by themselves should not be taken as an i
ndication that UVB therapy carries a higher risk than PUVA therapy whe
n administered to HIV-infected patients.