F. Robert et al., PHASE-I AND PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDY OF 7-DAY AND 21-DAY CONTINUOUS ETOPOSIDE INFUSION IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CANCER, Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 38(5), 1996, pp. 459-465
Purpose. This phase I study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and
tolerability of prolonged infusional etoposide, and to evaluate its ph
armacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile in patients with advanced cancer
. Methods. A group of 17 patients received a 7-day infusion of etoposi
de (schedule A) every 21 days at doses from 30 to 75 mg/m(2) per day,
and a second group of 37 patients a 21-day infusion (schedule B) every
28 days at doses from 18 to 40 mg/m(2) per day. Patients had a median
Karnofsky performance status (PS) of 80%, and 34 patients had no prio
r chemotherapy. Etoposide concentrations at steady state (Css) and oth
er pharmacokinetic parameters (plasma clearance, CLp; area under the c
urve, AUG) were determined during the first treatment cycle. Correlati
on coefficients were calculated to measure the relationship between va
riables. Results. Myelosuppression was the major toxicity, and was ass
ociated with three deaths. The maximum tolerated dose due to neutropen
ia was 75 mg/m(2) per day for schedule A and 40 mg/m(2) per day for sc
hedule B. There was significant interpatient pharmacokinetic variabili
ty in both infusional schedules. Even though etoposide dose levels did
not significantly correlate with plasma levels, the Css was 1 greater
than or equal to g/ml in the majority of the patients. A significant
correlation between AUC and neutrophil absolute decrease was noted onl
y in schedule B (r = 0.56, P = 0.003). There were several marginal rel
ationships in schedule B: PS versus Css (r = 0.31, P = 0.058), PS vers
us AUC (r = -0.38; P = 0.058) and age versus CLp (r = -0.31, P = 0.057
). Conclusion. Overall, significant correlations were found for severa
l hematologic variables and etoposide dose levels, but not with the Cs
s values. One major problem with the application of pharmacodynamic mo
dels to predict hematologic toxicity in clinical practice is the prese
nce of significant interpatient variability.