The use of nonspatial attentional mechanisms in search tasks was inves
tigated by presenting observers with stimuli that contained 4-12 eleme
nts located on a circle around the fixation point. The elements differ
ed in one of six nonspatial 'dimensions', namely orientation, contrast
, scale, number of cycles, 'shape', and place in the alphabet. The tar
get element of the search task differed from trial to trial but was al
ways presented to the observer as a nonspatial, visual cue. This cue w
as displayed either before the stimulus (precue) or after the stimulus
(postcue). Whereas a precue creates optimal conditions for the use of
nonspatial attentional mechanisms, a postcue precludes benefits from
their use. The fact that performance was better in the case of precued
stimuli than in the case of postcued stimuli indicates that observers
employed nonspatial attentional mechanisms. In the final analysis, ho
wever, the effect of nonspatial attention reduces to spatial attention
in combination with limited storage capacity.