ABORTION AND UNDUE BURDENS - JUSTICE OCONNOR,SANDRA,DAY AND JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING

Citation
Pa. Sullivan et Sr. Goldzwig, ABORTION AND UNDUE BURDENS - JUSTICE OCONNOR,SANDRA,DAY AND JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING, Women & politics, 16(3), 1996, pp. 27-54
Citations number
74
Categorie Soggetti
Women s Studies","Political Science
Journal title
ISSN journal
01957732
Volume
16
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
27 - 54
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-7732(1996)16:3<27:AAUB-J>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
This essay argues that Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's moral reasoning c oncerning abortion cases represents a female-associated jurisprudence. A female-associated jurisprudence negotiates a moral ground that valu es the rights of individuals as interdependent members of communities. From the recognition of the need to balance such interests emerges a jurisprudence that emphasizes the interconnectedness of all parties an d all competing interests in a dispute. In articulating the ''undue bu rden'' standard for evaluating abortion cases, Justice O'Connor has id entified an approach to legal decision-making that accommodates differ ence, contextualizes the law, and resists oversimplification of comple x issues.