This article offers two instances of the anthropologist's engagement i
n local curing sequences as examples of the agreement of identities be
tween anthropologist and shaman. This similitude of culturally dispara
te roles is rooted, we believe, in the power generally derived from th
e foreign and apart. It also comes from the nature of shamanism as the
world's only universal ''specialty,'' a congery of cures, techniques,
and packaged knowledge. We conclude that the identification of the an
thropologist as shaman is not necessarily a misidentification. In thei
r travels both define and cross boundaries wielding a power that is es
sentially relational and communicational: derived from a manipulation
of otherness, and from the use of words as things.