A new thermally based ventilation system ('Floormaster') with inlet of
cool clean air at floor level, and evacuation at the ceiling of the a
ir warmed by activity in the room (upward displacement ventilation, 17
air changes/h) was compared with a standard positive pressure (plenum
) ventilation system with air supply through an inclined perforated sc
reen along one wall at the ceiling and evacuation at floor level (conv
entional turbulent or mixing system, 16 air changes/h). The study was
made during rigidly standardized sham operations (N = 20) performed in
the same operating room by a six-member team wearing non-woven dispos
able or cotton clothing. In general the upward displacement system rem
oved dust particles too small to carry bacteria (0.16- < 0.3 mu m, 0.0
01 < P < 0.01) more efficiently than the conventional system. However,
the displacement system also yielded two to threefold higher air and
surface bacterial counts in areas important for surgical asepsis (Roun
d area, instrument table) especially with regard to bacterial sediment
ation (0.001 < P < 0.05). The major shortcoming of the displacement sy
stem was insufficient elimination of the larger bacteria-carrying part
icles. The type of clothing worn by the members of the team did not in
fluence the overall results. We conclude that an upward displacement s
ystem will lead to increased counts of airborne and sedimenting bacter
ia and thus increase the risk of postoperative infection in comparison
with conventional operating room ventilation systems.