Bioprostheses derived from collagenous tissues have to be fixed and su
bsequently sterilized before they can be implanted in humans, Clinical
ly, the most commonly used fixative is glutaraldehyde, However, the te
ndency for glutaraldehyde to markedly alter tissue stiffness and promo
te tissue calcification are well-recognized drawbacks of this fixative
. To address the deficiencies with the glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue, a
new fixative, epoxy compound, was used to fix biological prostheses, T
he study was undertaken to investigate the fixation rates and crosslin
king densities of biological tissues fixed with various epoxy compound
s. These epoxy compounds are different in their chemical structures, G
lutaraldehyde was used as a control, The fixation rates and crosslinki
ng densities of the fixed tissues were determined by measuring their f
ixation indices and denaturation temperatures, respectively. Generally
, the epoxy-fixed tissues were more pliable than the glutaraldehyde-fi
xed one. Furthermore, the tissues fixed with monofunctional epoxy comp
ound were more pliable than those fixed with multifunctional epoxy com
pounds. With increasing pH or temperature, the fixation rate of epoxy
compound increased, However, the number of epoxide functional groups d
id not seem to affect the fixation rate of the epoxy compound. The fix
ation rate of glutaraldehyde was faster than that of epoxy compounds,
Additionally, the crosslinking density of the glutaraldehyde-fixed tis
sue was greater than that of the epoxy-fixed counterparts, Moreover, i
t was noted that the denaturation temperatures of the tissues fixed wi
th glutaraldehyde or multifunctional epoxy compounds were significantl
y higher than the fresh ones (p <0.05), while that fixed with monofunc
tional epoxy compound stayed roughly the same throughout the entire fi
xation process (p >0.05). The results obtained in this study may be us
ed to optimize the fixation process for developing bioprostheses fixed
with epoxy compounds. (C) 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.