T. Wehrmann et al., ESOPHAGEAL AND ANORECTAL MOTILITY IN PATI ENTS WITH SPHINCTER OF ODDIDYSFUNCTION, Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie, 34(8), 1996, pp. 483-489
Esophageal and anorectal motility have not been systematically evaluat
ed in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD). We have inves
tigated 8 consecutive patients (6 females, 52.5 +/- 9.5 y) with type I
-SOD (according to the Milwaukee-classification), 12 patients (9 femal
es, 50.4 +/- 12.3 y) with type III-SOD, and 20 healthy volunteers (15
females, 48.5 +/- 15.2 y) by means of a standardized questionnaire for
esophageal and anorectal symptoms, esophageal manometry, colonic tran
sit time evaluation, and anorectal manometry. Symptom-scores did not d
iffer significantly between type-I and type ill-SOD-patients, respecti
vely. Furthermore, there were no relevant differences of the symptom-s
cores of the SOD-patients vs. healthy subjects. However, the lower eso
phageal sphincter pressure (LESP) was significantly higher in patients
with type I-SOD (26.8 +/- 7.4 mmHg) than in both, type Ill-SOD-patien
ts (20.3 +/- 4.0 mmHg, p < 0.05) and healthy subjects (18.6 +/- 3.5 mm
Hg, p < 0.001), respectively. Mean colonic transit time did not differ
significantly between both groups of patients (type I-SOD, 27.9 +/- 2
1.4 h, vs, type III-SOD, 28.5 +/- 15.1 h, p < 0.05). The anal sphincte
r resting pressure (ARP) was significantly higher in patients with typ
e I-SOD (90.8 +/- 15.5 mmHg) than in healthy subjects (74.1 +/- 10.3,
p < 0.01), but did not differ significantly from that in patients with
type III-SOD (82.1 +/- 11.5 mmHg, p = 0.17). Computer-assissted ''bea
t-to-beat''-evaluation showed an abnormal heart rate variability in 3/
8 patients with type I-SOD. These results give evidence for a systemic
involvement of the lower esophageal and the anal sphincter in patient
s with type I-SOD, which does not occur in patients with type III-SOD.