Ve. Rushton et al., A 2-CENTER STUDY TO DETERMINE DENTISTS AGREEMENT WITH CURRENT GUIDELINES ON THE FREQUENCY OF BITEWING RADIOGRAPHY, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 24(3), 1996, pp. 175-181
Citations number
60
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
The main aim of this study was to compare the intervals between initia
l and recall bitewing radiography recommended by general dental practi
tioners (GDPs) with those advocated in published guidelines. A questio
nnaire containing eight clinical scenarios was distributed to GDPs in
two areas of England, Birmingham (fluoridated) and Manchester (non-flu
oridated). The response rate was 70.8%. There was considerable agreeme
nt (>66.0%) with recommended guidelines for all low caries risk scenar
ios, but in three out of the four high caries risk scenarios a minorit
y of dentists were in agreement (<49.5%). In high caries risk scenario
s there was a tendency to over prescription with adult patients and un
der-prescription for patients in the mixed dentition. For all low risk
scenarios except the youngest patient, there was a significantly grea
ter agreement with the guidelines amongst Birmingham dentists, with th
e Manchester group having a greater tendency to over-prescription. Thi
s difference may be related to the effects of fluoridation of the wate
r supply in the Birmingham area. There was generally greater agreement
with the guidelines amongst younger dentists, with their old colleagu
es tending to under-prescription. The results suggest that greater emp
hasis on selection criteria in continuing education of dentists is req
uired.