On the basis of reviewing three resumes, 80 college students (44 women
, 36 men), role-playing as human resource managers, were asked to reco
mmend a candidate for a sales position al a brokerage firm. The appare
nt gender of candidates for the position was manipulated by assigning
names that were gender-ambiguous or gender specific to a given resume.
Students were asked to select one of three candidates: (1) the most q
ualified, (2) the less qualified for whom gender was ambiguous, or (3)
the less qualified who differed in gender from the most qualified. St
udents were also asked to select a second candidate for an interview f
or the job. Analysis indicated both men and women favored their own ge
nder. Only 56% of these college students who were enrolled in psycholo
gy and business courses, which should serve as some foundation for a c
areer in human resources, actually selected the most qualified applica
nt.