Theory: I take a resource dependence perspective on the reform of coll
ectivized agriculture. Hypothesis: Collective farms resist breakup if
they are dependent on resources distributed through the command econom
y. The state's role in the distribution of resources is explained by i
ts relationship to the peasantry before collectivization. Methods: I u
se comparative case histories of Russian and Chinese agriculture. Resu
lts: Large-scale decollectivization of agriculture will not occur in R
ussia as long as collective farms remain dependent on redistribution t
hrough the state apparatus. The role of collectivization in the state-
building process explains why the Soviet collective farm was tied stro
ngly to the state, while the Chinese collective farm was not.