Re. Hero et Cj. Tolbert, A RACIAL ETHNIC DIVERSITY INTERPRETATION OF POLITICS AND POLICY IN THE STATES OF THE US/, American journal of political science, 40(3), 1996, pp. 851-871
Theory: This paper examines a new interpretation of politics in the st
ates of the U.S.-that racial and ethnic diversity, and the levels and
types of this diversity, are central to understanding politics and pol
icy in the states. We conceptualize and statistically model states in
terms of their homogeneous, heterogeneous, or bifurcated racial/ethnic
composition. Hypothesis: Racial/ethnic diversity provides a theoretic
al and empirical explanation for policy variations in the states. Meth
ods: Data are used to develop two measures of racial/ethnic diversity:
an index of minority diversity and white ethnic diversity. These indi
ces are compared with ''political culture'' categories using descripti
ve and inferential statistics. Using regression analysis, the measures
of racial/ethnic diversity are examined relative to several state pol
icies. Results: Racial/ethnic diversity explains much of the variation
in the grouping of state political cultures. Increased minority diver
sity (bifurcation) is associated with lower overall education and soci
al policy outcomes. But when the policies are disaggregated by race, w
e find that policies for minorities are especially poor in homogeneous
states. The unique contribution of the diversity interpretation is th
at it can account for policy variation in the aggregate, as well as wi
th respect to specific policies as they affect minorities. Previous re
search concerning race and public policy addresses the former (aggrega
te) outcomes, but does not anticipate nor explain the latter, especial
ly the dynamics of race/ethnicity in homogeneous contexts. Also, diffe
rent types of ''political pluralism''-consensual, competitive, and hie
rarchical-are associated with varying levels of racial/ethnic diversit
y.