Vjb. Rice et al., THE EFFECTS OF GENDER, TEAM SIZE, AND A SHOULDER HARNESS ON A STRETCHER-CARRY TASK AND POST-CARRY PERFORMANCE .1. A STIMULATED CARRY FROM AREMOTE SITE, International journal of industrial ergonomics, 18(1), 1996, pp. 27-40
This study examined the effects of gender, two- vs. four-person teams,
and use of a shoulder harness vs. a hand carry on the ability of part
icipants to simulate the transport of patients during a prolonged stre
tcher carry, and to simulate the defense and medical treatment of pati
ents following the stretcher carry. Participants carried a 6.8-kg stre
tcher containing an 81.6-kg manikin at a constant rate of 4.8 km/h for
as long as possible, up to a half hour. Dependent measures included c
arry time, weapon firing, fine-motor coordination, heart rate, oxygen
uptake, perceived exertion, and subjective symptoms, Analysis of varia
nce and post-hoc Newman-Keuls comparison of means revealed that men ca
rried stretchers longer than women (p < 0.05). Harness use resulted in
the stretcher being carried longer (23.1 +/- 18.9 vs. 6.1 +/- 5.9 min
), at lower heart rates (141.9 +/- 17.9 vs. 149.9 +/- 14.7 beats per m
in), at slightly higher intensity (46 +/- 8 vs. 42 +/- 7% VO2 max) (p
< 0.05), and with less fatigue in the forearm and hand(p < 0.05). Four
-person teams maintained pre-carry fine-motor and marksmanship scores
and carried longer (16.9 +/- 11.0 vs. 12.3 +/- 11.4 min), while workin
g at a slightly lower intensity (43 +/- 8 vs. 45 +/- 8% VO(2)max), com
pared with two-person teams (p < 0.05). Use of four-person teams with
a harness resulted in an 8-fold increase in carry time, compared with
two-person hand-carry teams (24.5 +/- 9.0 vs. 3.0 +/- 1.8 min). Four-p
erson teams with a shoulder harness are therefore recommended for prol
onged carries.