Sd. Croll et al., ROLE OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF OSTEOMYELITIS IN DIABETIC FOOT INFECTIONS, Journal of vascular surgery, 24(2), 1996, pp. 266-270
Purpose: The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis
of osteomyelitis in foot infections in diabetics was investigated. Th
e accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of MRI, plain radiography, an
d nuclear scanning were determined for diagnosing osteomyelitis, and a
cost comparison was made, Methods: Twenty-seven patients with diabeti
c foot infections were studied prospectively. All patients underwent M
RI and plain radiography. Twenty-two patients had technetium bone scan
s, and 19 patients had Indium scans. Nineteen patients had all four te
sts performed. Patients with obvious gangrene or a fetid foot were exc
luded. Results: The diagnosis of osteomyelitis was established by path
ologic specimen (n = 18), bone culture (n = 3), or successful response
to medical management (n = 6). Osteomyelitis was confirmed in nine of
the pathologic specimens. The diagnostic sensitivity specificity and
accuracy for MRI was 88%, 100%, and 95%, respectively, for plain radio
graphy it was 22%, 94%, and 70%, respectively for technetium bone scan
ning it was 50%, 50%, and 50%, respectively and for Indium leukocyte s
canning it was 33%, 69%, and 58%, respectively. The data were analyzed
statistically with the two-tailed Fisher's exact test. MRI was the on
ly test that was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Conclusions: MR
I appeared to be the single best test for the diagnosis of osteomyelit
is associated with diabetic foot infections. It had a better diagnosti
c accuracy than conventional modalities and appeared to be more cost-e
ffective than. the frequently used Indium scan.