SIMULTANEITY OF 2 EFFECTORS IN SYNCHRONIZATION WITH A PERIODIC EXTERNAL SIGNAL

Citation
M. Billon et al., SIMULTANEITY OF 2 EFFECTORS IN SYNCHRONIZATION WITH A PERIODIC EXTERNAL SIGNAL, Human movement science, 15(1), 1996, pp. 25-38
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Experimental",Psychology
Journal title
ISSN journal
01679457
Volume
15
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
25 - 38
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-9457(1996)15:1<25:SO2EIS>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Several studies have shown that the control of simultaneous movements differ according to the execution context. For instance, when subjects raise simultaneously their index finger and heel as fast as possible after an auditory signal, the simultaneity is controlled by sending sy nchronously the motor commands to both effecters. On the other hand, w hen subjects self-pace their movements, the simultaneity is controlled by processing the delay between afferent signals from both movements at the central level (Paillard, 1948). It has been hypothesized that a mode of control similar to the self-paced condition is also used when subjects produce simultaneous and repetitive movements in synchroniza tion with a metronome (Fraisse, 1980). We examined this hypothesis by asking subjects to move simultaneously the index finger and heel in sy nchronization with metronome sounds. Results showed that the events ch ronology (i.e., heel movement first, finger movement second and metron ome sound third) was a function of the relative distance of the effect ers and auditory organ from the central comparator. We deduced that th e synchronization and simultaneity was evaluated by computing the time elapsed between the arrival of the sensory feedback of the movement a nd auditory signal. The second goal of the study was to assess whether , in such a task, each effector is synchronized separately to the metr onome sound or together as an unit. A strong positive correlation was found between finger and heel synchronization errors. This supports th e hypothesis that finger and heel movements are synchronized as an uni t to the metronome rather than independently. In conclusion, simultane ity between effecters and synchronization between effecters and an ext ernal signal, although they share similar processes based on afferent information, are likely to be controlled separately.