Recent population-based efficacy trials of the synthetic malaria vacci
ne SPf66 have shown restricted, if any, clinical protection against Pl
asmodium falciparum infection. Despite the well-established role of an
tibodies in effector responses against asexual blood-stage malaria par
asites, the titres of anti-SPf66 IgG antibodies do not correlate with
the ability of sera from vaccine recipients to inhibit parasite growth
in vitro nor with partial clinical protection which could be detected
in some trials. Qualitative or functional parameters of SP66-induced
antibody responses, such as IgG subclass composition and affinity, may
be more predictive of clinical protection against malaria than quanti
tative estimates of antibody concentration or titre. Since these param
eters are readily estimated by laboratory techniques currently availab
le, and may be modulated by changes in vaccination protocols and by th
e use of different adjuvants, a better understanding of qualitative an
tibody responses induced by SPf66 and other asexual blood-stage malari
a vaccine candidates, and of their relationship with clinical protecti
on in vivo, is urgently needed for the improvement of currently used i
mmunization schedules.