N. Sundaresan et al., INDICATIONS AND RESULTS OF COMBINED ANTERIOR-POSTERIOR APPROACHES FORSPINE TUMOR SURGERY, Journal of neurosurgery, 85(3), 1996, pp. 438-446
Spinal instrumentation currently allows gross-total resection and reco
nstruction in cases of malignancies at all levels of the spine. The au
thors analyzed the results in 110 patients who underwent surgery for p
rimary and metastatic spinal tumors over a 5-year period (1989-1993) a
t a single institution. Major primary sites of tumor included breast (
14 cases), chordoma (14 cases), lung (12 cases), kidney (11 cases), sa
rcoma (13 cases), plasmacytoma (10 cases), and others (36 cases). Prio
r to surgery, 55 patients (50%) had received prior treatment. Forty-ei
ght patients (44%) were nonambulatory, and severe paraparesis was pres
ent in 20 patients. Fifty-three patients (48%) underwent combined ante
rior-posterior resection and instrumentation, 33 (30%) underwent anter
ior resection with instrumentation, 18 (16%) underwent anterior or pos
terior resection alone, and the remaining six patients (5%) underwent
posterior resection and instrumentation. Major indications for anterio
r-posterior resection included three-column involvement, high-grade in
stability, involvement of contiguous vertebral bodies, and solitary me
tastases. Postoperatively, 90 patients improved neurologically. The ov
erall median survival was 16 months, with 46% of patients surviving 2
years. Fifty-three patients (48%) suffered postoperative complications
. Despite the high incidence of complications, the majority of patient
s reported improvement in their quality of life at follow-up review. O
ur findings suggest that half of all patients with spinal malignancies
require combined anterior-posterior surgery for adequate tumor remova
l and stabilization.