Ar. Schwartz et al., ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF THE LINGUAL MUSCULATURE IN OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP-APNEA, Journal of applied physiology, 81(2), 1996, pp. 643-652
The influence of lingual muscle activity on airflow dynamics in the up
per airway was examined in nine patients with obstructive sleep apnea.
Muscles that retract the tongue (hyoglossus and styloglossus) and pro
trude the tongue (genioglossus) were selectively stimulated electrical
ly during sleep with fine wire electrodes placed intramuscularly trans
orally. We confirmed that stimulation with 50 Hz and 40-mu s pulse dur
ation did not elicit changes in electroencephalographic patterns or he
art rate or alter airflow after the stimulation burst had ceased. The
highest stimulus intensity that did not arouse patients from sleep was
then utilized to examine the effect of lingual muscle recruitment on
airflow dynamics during steady-state periods of inspiratory airflow li
mitation. When applying a stimulus burst during single inspirations, m
aximal inspiratory airflow decreased by 239 +/- 177 ml/s (P < 0.05) du
ring retractor stimulation, whereas maximal inspiratory airflow increa
sed by 217 +/- 93 ml/s during protrusor stimulation (P < 0.001) compar
ed with breaths immediately before and after the stimulated breath. Wh
en consecutive inspirations were stimulated repeatedly, protrusor stim
ulation decreased the frequency of obstructive breathing episodes in f
our patients breathing at 3.9 +/- 3.4 (SD) cmH(2)O nasal pressure. The
findings suggest that stimulation of the lingual muscles can increase
or decrease airflow depending on the specific muscles stimulated with
out arousing patients from sleep.