The experiments outlined in this article were performed so that the ac
quisition effects of KR scheduling on no-KR retention could be determi
ned. In Experiment 1, the group that alternated between 12 KR and 12 n
o-KR responses produced better retention than both the group that alte
rnated between 6 KR and 6 no-KR responses and an all-KR group. The par
tial KR group that performed the best on retention also received the l
east number of reversals from KR to no-KR responses and from no-KR to
KR responses, however. In Experiment 2, when acquisition KR reversals
were held constant for partial KR groups, groups that received either
random KR scheduling or all KR produced similar and better retention t
han groups who received blocked KR scheduling. These results were reco
nciled with KR frequency experiments by proposing that memory processe
s invoked by KR protocols decrease from KR frequency, to reversal, to
scheduling conditions.