SUBJECTIVITY AND INTERSUBJECTIVITY OF CLINICAL FACTS

The author has learned a great deal from the IJPA 75th Anniversary Iss ue, particularly regarding ways in which psychoanalysts across the wor ld are consensually re-defining psychoanalysis as a quintessentially s ubjective and intersubjective endeavour In summarising her response to the Issue, she addresses the ways in which its focus on psychoanalyti c subjectivity and intersubjectivity helps to define the nature of psy choanalysis as a scientific endeavour. In addition, she identifies an area that she wished had been more developed in the Issue: some furthe r specification of the cognitive and communicative processes that make for psychoanalytic subjectivity and intersubjectivity. She speculates that, as we continue our attempts further to understand those process es, we may find it valuable to look towards a body of research that is absent from consideration in the 75th Anniversary Issue (and is, for that matter, absent from serious and scientific consideration by psych oanalysts in general): research on mental effects currently considered 'anomalous' or outside the bounds of conventionally defined human men tal function and capacity. She describes briefly some of that research in the context of its possible relevance to issues of psychoanalytic subjectivity and intersubjectivity. She takes up the specific relevanc e of that research to phenomena we have traditionally subsumed under c ategories of experience like intuition, empathic attunement and uncons cious communication.