EFFECT OF STIMULUS-INTENSITY ON PROLACTIN AND CORTISOL RELEASE INDUCED BY UNILATERAL ELECTROCONVULSIVE-THERAPY

Citation
Ap. Zis et al., EFFECT OF STIMULUS-INTENSITY ON PROLACTIN AND CORTISOL RELEASE INDUCED BY UNILATERAL ELECTROCONVULSIVE-THERAPY, Neuropsychopharmacology, 15(3), 1996, pp. 263-270
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,Psychiatry,"Pharmacology & Pharmacy",Neurosciences,Psychiatry,"Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Journal title
Neuropsychopharmacology
ISSN journal
0893133X → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
263 - 270
Database
ISI
SICI code
0893-133X(1996)15:3<263:EOSOPA>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Prolactin (PRL) plasma levels rise several fold in response to electro convulsive therapy (ECT). There is evidence that the magnitude of ECT- induced PRL release varies as a function of electrode placement with b ilateral (BL) ECT, producing a larger PRL increase than does unilatera l (UL) producing a larger PRL increase than does unilateral (UL) ECT. Although there is some evidence that the amount of PRL released by ECT may also vary as a function of stimulus intensity, the effect of stim ulus intensity on the amount of PRL released by UL ECT has not been st udied. This is an important question because it is with UL electrode p lacement that large differences in clinical efficacy as a function of stimulus intensity have been documented. We studied patients undergoin g a course of UL ECT as the clinically indicated treatment for their i llness. Subjects received low-dose (threshold) and high-dose (three ti mes the threshold) ECT on two consecutive treatments. The order of low - and high-dose treatments was counterbalanced. Blood samples were dra wn at 15-minute intervals before and for 1 hour after the administrati on of ECT and assayed for PRL and cortisol levels. Our results clearly indicate that the PRL and cortisol response to UL ECT-induced PRL rel ease varies as a function of stimulus intensity. In fact, the amount o f PRL released by high-dose UL ECT was nearly three times greater than that released by threshold stimulation. These results are consistent with the hypothesis advocating that the therapeutic advantage of high- intensity over low-intensity UL ECT is the result of greater seizure g eneralization and spread to subcortical regions and suggest that ECT-i nduced PRL release has the potential to distinguish a seizure induced by a therapeutic stimulus from a seizure induced by a stimulus known t o have little therapeutic effect.