A QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT TESTING CRITERIA THROUGH PROGRAM DECOMPOSITION

Citation
Cm. Chung et al., A QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT TESTING CRITERIA THROUGH PROGRAM DECOMPOSITION, Information sciences, 93(3-4), 1996, pp. 211-233
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Information Science & Library Science","Computer Science Information Systems
Journal title
ISSN journal
00200255
Volume
93
Issue
3-4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
211 - 233
Database
ISI
SICI code
0020-0255(1996)93:3-4<211:AQFDTC>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
We present a quantitative comparison among different testing criteria. Testing criteria are methodologies that serve as the guidance for sof tware testing. First, we survey various software testing criteria. We find that the quantitative difference among different criteria is a go od guideline for selecting appropriate testing methodologies. Also, Al l-Statements and Al-Branches testing criteria are two famous testing c riteria that are widely applied in software testing. This paper infers a quantitative analysis to measure the difference between the All-Sta tements criterion and the All-Branches criterion. The quantitative ana lysis provides a theoretical basis for measuring testing efforts betwe en different testing methodologies. A testing metric based on our anal ysis is then proposed to compare All-Statements and All-Branches crite ria. An algorithm for this metric is also presented.