Cs. Park et al., TRANSCATHETER INSTILLATION OF UROKINASE INTO LOCULATED PLEURAL EFFUSION - ANALYSIS OF TREATMENT EFFECT, American journal of roentgenology, 167(3), 1996, pp. 649-652
OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to evaluate the usefulness of intracavita
ry instillation of urokinase in the treatment of loculated pleural eff
usion. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We analyzed CT and sonographic scans of 3
1 patients with loculated pleural effusion treated with intracavitary
urokinase. When the drainage was less than 100 ml/day, urokinase was i
nstilled through the catheter until the drainage was less than 50 ml/d
ay. Response to the treatment was assessed on follow-up chest radiogra
phs and classified into three groups: completely effective (lung expan
sion >80%), partially effective (20-80%), and ineffective (<20%). The
sonographic pattern of pleural fluid was classified as anechoic, linea
r septated, or honeycomb, and the thickness of the parietal pleura was
measured on CT scans. RESULTS. Of the 16 patients in whom treatment w
as completely effective, sonography showed an anechoic appearance in 1
2 and a linear septated appearance in four, and the thickness of the p
arietal pleura on CT scans was 2 mm in six, 3 mm in seven, and 4 mm in
three. Of the nine patients in whom treatment was partially effective
, sonography showed an anechoic appearance in six and a linear septate
d appearance in three, and the thickness of the parietal pleura on CT
scans was 3 mm in five and 4 mm in four. Of the six patients in whom t
reatment was ineffective, sonography showed a linear septated appearan
ce in one and a honeycomb appearance in five, and the thickness of the
parietal pleura on CT scans was 3 mm in one, 4 mm in two, 5 mm in one
, and 6 mm in two. CONCLUSION. Urokinase instillation through a percut
aneous catheter was effective in the treatment of loculated pleural ef
fusion in most patients but was not effective in patients whose pleura
l fluid had a honeycomb appearance on sonography or whose parietal ple
ura had a thickness of more than 5 mm on CT scans.